Hagler and LaMotta are on his level surely. Wayne McCullough as well.
Exactly, he is usually mentioned in threads of that nature.
Are you asking for guys who rate higher head to head in their prime than they do on career greatness?
1. Jones Jr. 2. Robinson 3. Hagler 4. Monzon 5. Valdez
Nah, Duran was off rhythm yes, but more calculated I'd say, Pryor was often hit on the way in and off balance, which is why he was dropped by...
Agreed, a swarmer like Dempsey gets creamed by a huge puncher like Foreman. Though Tyson stands a much better chance.
That's all I needed to hear, argue with someone else.
Duran would outdo him on the inside, being as he was much craftier and more skilled, had a better outside game and was a much better defensive...
He may well not be quite top 10 depending on how you look at his career, but calling him a poor man's Pryor just shows you haven't seen nearly...
That is an excerpt I've just copied, so I guess he was a combo of the two, which seems a bit hard to be. Still I would go with Whitaker to beat...
I've heard much different about Loi, that he was a very slick fighter, though I've never seen him fight as there is no footage.
Your opinion of Duran blows, but I notice Amsterdam didn't even attempt to respond to this post.
You blow my mind by saying Ali was overrated.
Cotto is more versatile, as well as bigger, than the Chavez Pea faced. Pea wins this fight, but it's no embarassment.
He would lose to Hearns, but nah, he beats Basilio and many others on that list. You're obviously a hater and romancer of the old days.
