DeGale was bad against Traux but even just a 10% improvement on that, I'd pick him against Eubank. Easy, easy work if he's even close to his best.
Things won't end well for Keith. Errol Spence will tear this man up, he's improving all the time. The way he controlled Peterson really impressed...
I used to love watching Naz, great fighter. But after he lost, he kinda just quit & went away. He sulked after Calvo fight didn't go down well....
Oops !
That's what happens when you come against someone who understands how to control distance & you have no idea creatively how to close it without...
He has no clue how to work his way in to range. No use of the jab, no real feints, no baiting. Just a lunge or tries to simply walk in. No...
I'll take it.
Eubank really is average at this level.
Why do people underestimate basic boxing fundamentals. Eubank has flaws, flaws and more flaws. Groves a class above. Quite easy work.
Said as much, Groves controls distance, controls on inside and counters. Eubank has poor feet. Well done GG.
A travesty if Lomachenko-Linares doesn't happen. Nobody at 130 comes close to beating Lomachenko.
I think Groves distance control & timing will give Eubank fits, all good moving against Yildrim walking forward behind a high guard & no set ups...
Groves UD.
I'm going for Groves. It's hard to judge Eubank jr IMO. His performance against Yildrim drew praise, but Yildrim was as straight up & down basic...
Nah. Neither was the famed WBU title. Major bodies are far from perfect but the best want those belts, I don't see the top names chasing Gavin if...