[IMG] [IMG] [IMG] I'd butcher this girl with my exponentially-hardening **** :firedevi:
What, even his earlier fights (pre-Jones)? Define good here.
Yeah, I got that too. Dunno if it's true or not :?.
Really :shock:? I didn't know B-Hop was the type to actually do that.
I'm assessing the financial situation of Bernard Hopkins from a historical perspective. I'm wondering from what times his biggest paydays...
He's asking for the rules to be changed so that at least he can bring a claw hammer and tuck it in his shorts.
And pick up a pair of balls at Mayweather's crib. Oh I forgot. He won't find any there.
I'd use my dick as an ass-whip on that girl.
Yeah that's the worry - when a fighter's behaviour starts to impact your own fight analysis. Usually I try to leave such things at the door......
Hey, I think it deep down. But thanks to Floyd, I now can't prove it.
I don't hate Floyd. And I'm still picking him to win. Even after he pulled this ***** move.
The question then is; has WADA developed adequate testing measures to detect HGH in the bloodstream (from blood testing) as opposed to urine...
-1 for me. See I don't even want him to lose. That's the thing - I'm not a PBF hater. And to be honest, I was telling everyone just how...
Oh for God's sakes. Fine, put convicted in speech marks if you must a la "convicted". Still the same old bull and you know it.
And then there's the issue of what definition "extensive" should really take. That's a real can of worms, right there.
