Also, I'll add, just because Brook didn't have to bulk up, rather he just didn't cut weight, it doesn't mean he's a natural fit for 160 lbs....
Then let me rephrase my original claim: Brook's optimal weight, AT THIS TIME, is smaller than Golovkin's. Therefore, his performance was affected...
Just because they weigh the same doesn't mean they're the same size. Technically they are but one is NATURALLY that size while the other is more...
I think you hit the nail on the head for both of us. Well done.
I agree. Sounds like a different argument entirely though. Well Wilder is a different case. I think Loma vs Davis should occur early 2018. It'd...
Not easy, just not Loma yet. I fell like this fight is better if Davis develops just a tad more. I'm not talking years, just another fight and...
He's downplaying the significance of the fight. Which, let's be honest, this fight is better next year. It's not like Loma is getting old....
Golovkin is more effective at middleweight because he's bigger. Brook has documented issues with 147, he's still more effective there than...
All I'm saying is Floyd was bigger than Marquez, Golovkin was bigger than Brook. Brook can weigh whatever he wants, he doesn't carry the mass like...
I know. That's also irrelevant to the debate me and this guy are having.
It gets harder to become an ATG as time passes. You can't place someone in that category until they've retired, usually. I like Ward but I'd...
And if Brook were facing at welterweight that fight would've played out differently. I don't know why you act like size didn't play a part in this...
If he entered the ring at that weight he would be. If Brook fought at 168 against Curtis Stevens, weighed more than Curtis Stevens on fight...
1. I'm not refuting everything because I'm on my phone. Too annoying to cut and paste and type a novel. 2. Not "a hypothetical 180 pound...
Lol your first response about Brook entering the ring at 180 tells me everything I need to know.
