You're fixed on hard numbers which isn't wrong, but doesn't take into account context. Fact is Golovkin is a middleweight and has been. Brook is...
The back lash is larger for Floyd than it is for Golovkin, which is true, but there's two important notes to that; 1) Floyd is more...
There's going to be a lot of compensating scoring from both sides. Expectations will sway opinions
The problem is people might not deem it correct.
Golovkin had a considerable size advantage. He's a natural middleweight, Brook was just bulking up. If Crawford moves up to 147 and faces Thurman...
He's saying only Golovkin and Loma can get away with it. Mayweather can't.
You're right, we don't have the details. Best to wait. I hate the word "dragged", it implies they were forced against their will. While I agree...
Unless you're checking everyone's location or they have flags as avatars I'd slow down on that nationality bit.
Mayweather vs Marquez Golovkin vs Brook Loma vs Rigo All extremely similar situations. Bias depends on who you ask.
At this stage it's Loma, probably even prime for prime too. If the fight happened sooner though it's more of a toss up. Reason I pick Loma is...
That's what I thought.
Lol how? I hold them in the same regard. In fact, I know Crawford's resume isn't amazing despite being undisputed. Crawford and Loma are ranked...
Irrelevant to their "path".
Kind of like Loma's path to his first title. Ands I hold these two in the same regard today.
A better question is why did you think I was mad?
