I kinda like this fight, Cotto's my second favorite fighter. But can we now comprehensively say that he "priced" himself out with the Pacquiao fight?
It's a convenient method of discrediting other people's resume.
Pacquiao-Sasakul: Pac then a scrappy unheralded 19 year old was sent to his opponent's country to be fed as routine fodder to bolster the Thai...
I wouldn't. Cotto is legit and will pose Floyd some problems. I know some immature Floydettes use that line of reasoning, but it's a transparently...
This isn't even close. Outside of boxing nerds, Pacquiao is the defacto face of boxing. I mean his career isn't even over yet but there's already...
I think Marquez's success against Pacquiao got alotta people fooled. The fact is, JMM is unproven at this weight and will be giving up too...
Oh look at you pulling rank. For some perspective, I saw Oscar win gold at Barcelona. Anyhoos, I was just being honest. :nutcase
The one against Pacquiao was my favorite Hoya fight...
Ok we agree on that.
Wow I haven't posted on this thread. But what a silly poll...76 pages? Seriously? Doesn't the word "floor" in "floored" kinda give it away?
How you think that fight would go?
Here's the crux of the problem when scoring this fight; there were just too many swing rounds (9-10?). That's one thing everyone can agree on. Now...
Pac's always been able to throw a right hook. I think what they worked on after EM/PacI was a baiting and timing punch with his right hook. He...
That pudgy ***** dnksab.
Predictably robotic left-hand-happy come-forward style...oh yeah, Pac definitely gets schooled by Tito. :patsch