[IMG]
:deal
Yeah, I said ''down the line'', as in ''the majority of the time''. Besides, Khan should have won that fight.
Yeah, the weight classes should be different for females.
Nice one. [IMG]
How is that even possible? I guess there are like a handful of girls that can live off the sport in each weight class?
Outside. No matter how good you are at close range, it's simply safer down the line to be a little farther.
She would have had a chance against a weak and chiny titlist like Robert Stieglitz IMO.
Yeah, Ann Wolfe is the man!:good She could probably win a belt from a weak male champion.
I agree with you on that one!:good They're ****ing adults. If they want to die, it's their right.
This is the Boxrec's number 1 female welterweight in the world (Anne Sophie Mathis).:patsch They fight like 9 year old amateurs! Wide open and...
Yeah, but the thing is that in 95% of the rounds, only clean punching will be useful because one of the fighter's blows will be ''better''. Here...
The scoring of a professional prize fight is based on four basic criteria: clean punching, effective aggressiveness, ring generalship, and...
No. There are 4 clear criterions for judging a fight. Sure, they are more or less subjective, but so be it.
No, I was talking about Stevenson-Stieglitz.