You can compare,because the question is nothing to do with the titles they won or how great they ended up,its about who they had fought at the...
What i dont get is that your telling me that performance enhancing drugs dont enhance performance,and even if they didnt in the slightest which...
Lets say they provide zero advantage but they are banned because they are percieved to. A. Why take them B.if theyre banned and you take them...
Great fight
He got wilder out of the fight coz the gloves didnt fit
Or even not mentioned as he wasnt guilty of anything.but at least he proved the burning question of "is arreola the man at hw"
He had a broken back aswell
Take her to the zoo
Exactly.there was level of meldononium allowed in the system as it was never banned,he was under it so they cancelled it. They lost purse...
If it werent for wilder facing as stiff a task as he did as an alternative it would look even more suspicious. Hes fought 1 top 10 contender in...
Sorry im misquoting you,i thought you said they werent benificial
Povetkin has fought his whole career with accusations of it.never been pulled or failed a test,he fights the most corrupt hw champion in...
If they werent beneficial,why would anyone take them who thought they werent good enough. The problem with boxing is,get caught,so what,its hardly...
Why do fighters take them then,is it just the buzz of being illegal and not being bothered about being labelled a drug cheat ?
