they've never beaten a fighter on the level of haye either. haye's faced better oppo than most of those guys too. maybe he should have ducked...
british commentators calling it a robbery... except they think murray was robbed. :huh
does that book include such classics as "i was drugged", "there was too much vaseline on my legs" or "i was ahead on the scorecards when the fight...
tbh he was in a steady decline from the first holyfield fight. rahman 2 was that one fight where he "rolled back the years" & produced the one...
you're right lewis was ****. he was pretty much shot...not as shot as tyson but still basically done. about the ref; i thought he was pretty...
cos the criteria being used by that other poster was "he didn't lose again for ages therefore he wasn't green". it's the old chestnut of using...
hopkins was green. sergio martinez didn't lose for ages after margarito beat him...doesnn't mean he wasn't green when he faced margarito....
tbh...i find that laughable. landing the better cleaner harder punches particularly to the body. defending better with his movement, slipping...
i'm old enough to remember when that meme was funny. :roll:
a) quit crying? i'm not crying. you are clearly a pac fanboy tho. :good b) yes. & you don't understand how it's supposed to be scored.
i'm not a fan of jmm. i actually like pac far far more. doesn't make what happened right. & btw bravo on falling back on the classic internet...
seriously? the aggressor who only threw fractionally more punches? that is bull****.
horrible argument. assumes the wisdom of crowds is always correct & makes no sound points of your own. is that the level you're at? if...
bull****.
jmm connected with far more tho. & most of pac's shots barely touch jmm as he slips or retreats or catches punches on his gloves. jmm landed some...
