no. 9 & no.10 have 1 win apiece at 168 in that time period. what magnificent "achievements". your maths are ****.
:nono i was only talking about him because you brought him up & said calzaghe didn't face him & should have...you twice said that calzaghe's...
one name...that you brought up numerous times. :hi:
i'm a big froch fan & i actually hope does "pass" calzaghe.:good
rudy markussen...a "prominent name"? :lol: rudy markussen: "top ranked contender". :lol: by fighting the mighty rudy markussen? :lol:...
:lol: dude...i'm laughing at you for being a mong. cos you're banging on about rudy ****ing markussen being a "top ranked" supermiddleweight...
no. he. wasn't. :lol: you are talking ****. sums you up really.
:rofl you think rudy markussen was a "highly rated " boxer. you think calzaghe's career has a gaping void cos he never faced rudy ****ing...
markussen did nothing of note in his entire career except lose to ottke. before joe faced pudwill (a last minute replacement for tate) he had...
no-one was interested in fighting him pre-lacy. for a variety of reasons...quite a few of which are calzaghe's own fault tbh. he faced the best he...
ottke didn't want the fight. beyer got an offer & then turned it down to fight kessler instead. kessler won...so calzaghe ended up fighting him.
you were saying "when calzaghe did go on the road" as if that was important. if it matters for one...it matters for both. you're not really...
no...you just DO pick apart calzaghe's resume. you can pick apart both with equal ease. so only fights "on the road" count? so we can...
i think they are/were both great boxers. if i'm a fan of one..it's froch cos he's a ****ing warrior but i like calzaghe too. it's absolutely...
would you have backed froch against prime taylor or prime johnson? 42 y/o glen gave him a tough fight & shot taylor outboxed him for 11 rds. i...
