no-one since benn/eubank times. :think it's a reactive argument...probably based on all the "froch has a better resume than calzaghe" threads.
:lol: that's me trolling. :thumbsup
nah...you're the angsty man utd fan right?
i wasn't...i was explicitly talking about the point the op was making by asking that question...& you said i "had trouble reading". which is...
this.
& i was talking about "the point". tocker pudwill would have won a belt had he beat calzaghe. :deal
how is that you doing this? it's not. :patsch
yeah...that's "the question"...but i think that "the point" the op is making is asking you look at froch's resume with a more objective eye &...
er...but that's what the op is pointing out...& you claimed you made him look "stupid"? did i miss the sarcasm or are you just a **** poor writer?
how so? or are you trolling again hook? :roll:
if his point was to make you look at froch's best wins with a more objective eye...then job done really. shot reid & brian magee?
funny how guys like shot taylor, blown-up mw abraham, past-it kessler, green dirrell, 42 year-old johnson etc are all "elite super middles" in...
by the time calzaghe moved up to 175...he had won every belt & there were no legitimate contenders left for him to face. he cleaned out the...
:nono reid turned down that fight when he was champ...calzaghe would have faced him whenever...& proved that by facing him when he had...
oh **** off with your ******ed bull****. :hi: until froch faces stieglitz, bika, groves & oosthuizen he is no-one...no-one......
