What does Holyfield vs. Tyson have to do with unification? You seem to be even more of an idiot than I imagined.... is that even possible?
How about his TKO loss against Solis? Haye was badly hurt on two occasions (wearing protective gear) and the ref stopped the fight.
Never ever... unless Kings gets options on Klitschko if Klitschko wins.
Nah, Don King would never let that happen. Remember when he had all belts under control? We did not see any unification fights back then, so no...
Are you trying to tell us that the winner of Maskaev vs. Peter will be a more recognized champ than Klitschko? :lol: :lol: :lol:
I'll wait for the weigh-in results before I decide if I am gonna place a small bet on Maskaev. If Peter is 250 or more, I'll bet on Maskaev.
And Toney had Peter stunned and bleeding from the nose, so?
Yes, the jab KD against Toney was a fluke. Toney wasn't hurt at all, he was just badly off balance. Are you going to try to prove the opposite?
Well, he did put Rahman down with a 1-2 combo in the 12th. On the other hand, when did Peter put someone down? The fluke jab KD against Toney...
I think Peter will try a blitzkrieg tactic. If Maskaev weathers the early storm and lands something semi-significant to remind Peter of his fight...
Not at all, considering that Peter has Don King on his side....
sure... when the other guy is barely capable of keeping his own balance and spends 90% of time against the ropes.
Peter was also bleeding against the light-hitting Toney and the fat middleweight had him stunned on a least one occasion.
If this goes to the scorecards, it's 100% in favor of Peter. Maskaev can win only by KO. Gotta land that uppercut and send Peter back to Nigeria....
Maskaev has not had a KO in 3 years? :lol::lol::lol: I guess you forgot Maskaev vs. Rahman II in 2006.... bad math or bad memory? or both?
