the 116-112 clearly was because he gave jmm the 12th . its impossible to give marquez only 3 rounds leading up to it. the other two judges aren't...
but he has a glass body
I could not find one round to give to pacquiao convincingly but I do see how someone can score it a draw or even for pacquiao. everyone crying...
50/50 doesn't sound realistic but jmm should get more leverage this time around. no less than 8 figures for el dinamita.
"Jmm is better than both"
fair enough. but I do see something very shady about the 116-112 scorecard. the 12th round was one of the close rounds and he gave it to jmm. that...
like I said in my thread if fighter A wins 7 rounds definitively but doesn't get the decision then its a robbery. if he wins 4 definitive rounds...
bump...
so judges in Leonard/Duran are incompetent then? if a round is won by a fighter ill give it to that fighter. if a round is so close that its...
its not a robbery its called reaching. a robbery is when there is absolutely no way that it could be scored for the other fighter but it did.
Why are you all making a big deal out of this?
There is no such thing as a wide or a close robbery. A robbery is a robbery period. If fighter A wins 7 definitive rounds or more but the decision...
Ok let me start off by saying that I was rooting for JMMs going into this fight because I got tired of all the Pacquiao r*****s claiming their guy...
because they arent good to begin with. Look at Kosta Tszyu, they claim him as their own but hes as Australian as Linares is Japanese.
Only an idiot would put Chavez "I quit against DelaHoya twice" ahead of Mayweather. Taylor and Rosario are his only 2 good wins. Rosario was...
