Fair enough, I wouldn't call anyone a mug for it mate. I've bought a lot off these Ppv's. I was just interested if people shared my opinion...
It's a question I'm asking as fan, not from a business point of view. Surely a boxing fan forum is the right place to discuss value for money ect....
It was going to be on boxnation, so wouldn of seen it with my boxnation subscription.
Yeah but we can't really judge if a fight is ppv worthy after the event. Fury v wlad was the 2 best in the division for all the belts. Joshua v...
Because ppv should in my opinion should be for the biggest fights, obviously people are buying them so it's working for them. Hence the question...
So sky stance to fans is: pay your subscription to watch boxing but every few months pay an extra £17, for fights that should really be part of...
What was the reason?
Tickets came today, should be a great fight/card
Think it will be a good fight again. Got a feeling linares wins by stoppage this time. Hope im wrong, would like to see crolla win the title back
The article is more questioning ppv for gavin, breazeale, whyte and Molina type fights. Brook v Spence is a great "trade" fight, one ill be buying
Good point about adverts between rounds, listening in to corner work should surely be part of what we've paid for. Your second point is exactly...
As a sky subscriber who expects boxing content to be largely covered for that fee, I think it's a liberty that I have to pay an extra £17 for...
Fair point, I've probably put this out at bad time, as it can be argued brook v Spence is ppv worthy. My article was more a criticism of ppv's...
Agree with that, I see Brook v Spence as similar to froch v bute and that was regular sky. Seems that any half decent fight is deemed ppv worthy....
Wrote a short article on sky's ppv policy, just hoping to get a few opinions. Are boxing fans being treated unfairly? “We have shelved...
