I think it could be argued that Wlad beats everyone Louis beat, and as comprehensively if not more so. He also doesn't lose to the fighters Louis...
Foreman wishes he was as good as Galaxy...
Your top ten, whatever it is, doesn't exist, never did, so any fight they were involved in did not happen... Simple way to look at it is Ali,...
Some really interesting selections here guys, thank you.
I think many people forget, or ignore this. The Holyfield George fought was an incredible fighter and he was competitive throughout. To add a cat...
Hey man, that's cool. We disagree, and that's what a forum is for, discussing things. I dont rate the young Foreman as highly as others do, never...
Because old Foreman doesn't engage in the kind of fight young George did and, whisper this, big Ron wasn't all that....Lyle wouldn't drop old...
....I posted this on another thread.... For me, the question of who was the better fighter is debatable, but I really think Old George beats...
Your 1-10 don't exist, never did, any fights they had dissappear..
Yup, apologies if I wasn't clear. It's a tricky ask....
Nice post. I made this thought experiment to help me 'judge/assess' fighters without the 'noise' of history and 'yeah, but he beat x, and y beat...
If Tyson was outside your top ten, could he be top of your alternate as he doesn't have losses to Holyfield or Lewis, instead he just got old and...
I guess it's not as easy as that. If your top ten don't exist, you are imagining a world where perhaps pivotal fights involving your 11 onwards...
OK, so, let's imagine a world where your top ten, whatever it is, doesn't exist. No Ali, no Louis, no Holmes etc...what does this alternate...
Is it only people of England who can comment?
