Pacquiao vs Bradley was better than Floyd vs Maidana. For one thing Pac clearly won his fight. Floyd and Maidana didn't even have a scratch on...
I was surprised at how 1-sided the public saw the Canelo fight but maybe I was giving him the benefit of the doubt for being this young-looking...
That's weird the differences. I thought he got a draw at best vs Castillo 1, gave Oscar 4 rounds the first time I watched it and 5 the second...
I think it was a response to the million dollar weight stipulation but that had some justification to it in that Floyd reneged on his contract...
Yes it is. I don't think he ever struggled with Bradley but looked lackluster in the first fight. On the other hand I don't think he ever didn't...
That's right what does Pac bring to the table. Only 2 million buys:yep. There is no way, as Forbes pointed out, that Floyd made as much as he...
That's not too shabby actually. Who's above the Bradley Marquez level because it's not Maidana?
Better late than never in terms of legacy as well. I want to see anybody current P4P that doesn't have Pac in the top 5. Floyd's last fight also...
Pac is the real superman though because Floyd hasn't been shown to have any cryptonite (JMM).:yep
Blah blah blah because unlike previous requests for additional testing, there was no rationale for singling him out in the first place. If anyone...
Now that is not true with the exception of JMM. The others mostly went into survival mode and that is why they were not entertaining.
The question should be, who if anyone would you pay $75 to watch Floyd fight. Only Pacquiao or Golovkin for me which means I probably won't buy...
This is true fonzie. The thread title says better to watch, not more exciting. Floyd at his best is spellbinding. Pac at his best is a little buzzsaw.
That's true. If Maidana wins it likely won't be by some dominating, virtuoso performance. It will be by war of attrition.
At this point I would prefer for circumstances to rob them of the record breaking payday. To punish them.
