OK, which of his wins impressed you? Because he seemed maybe somewhat less effective from that perspective than (say) Joe Bugner, who also made...
Right. I gauge them on their ability to win fights. Based on this criteria, bonavena comes out rather poorly. Based on his ability to impress you,...
Ok, who did oscar bonavena ever beat which makes you think he could beat a heavyweight who appears in lots of people's top 10 lists? What was his...
John L was the last champion of a pretty evolved sport - bareknuckle boxing under LPR rules. I doubt the skills were primitive, as the...
This is like asking "who do you have? Chris arreola or sonny liston?"
I'll take holyfield on the basis that he was an all time great rather than an average contender whose best win was over either a shot Folley or...
The question is who is better technically and the answer is clearly czyz because galento is technically the worst top 10 heavyweight since the...
Norton wins by virtue of being a better fighter than shavers who won big fights more often. Too much of "styles makes fights" in this thread;...
Turpin was probably the strongest middleweight ever from Britain. By all accounts he hit freakishly hard even at light heavy.
Louis was having trouble pulling the trigger by that time, granted, but I just can't see Tunney hitting harder judging by the way he throws...
Don Cockell was pretty good for a fat lad. Tunney's better but they were not leagues apart. And Gebralaisse might surprise us all against...
Looking at that Tunney must have been bloody fit because he doesn't half waste a lot of energy. Tunney sets himself well for someone that mobile,...
On the basis of that analysis, Haile Gebrselassie must have reminded him of Tunney as well. And he'd be right, they'd both last about the same...
Cooney is an easy fighter to assess. The way I typically approach this kind of assessment is: 1. Define what constitutes his included career. I...
I As u say, probably not a case of mistaken identity.
