i always thought that hagler, for example, just happened to have crazy bone density in his face, and head in general. of course he had all of the...
yeah. there's obviously a lot to it. would you say, though, that the fundamental ability to take a punch, removing all of these other factors, is...
when i say smarts, i'm talking about ring generalship, concentration, technique etc. my first response was pretty glib.
the reason technically skilled fighters don't tire easily? probably because, most of the time, someone who has trained hard enough to hone their...
three things that aid a chin: smarts, heart and conditioning. when people talk about the 'best chins', i tend to think about the attribute in...
yeah, otherwise it's just 'weight'.
tyson may be the most knowledgeble fighter who ever lived. probably not the wisest, but he knew his facts, and he has been known to offer a fair...
considering he fought at so many weights, he looked shockingly uncomfortable most of the time, except for... 140.
he would be second, but if you change it to 1970-80, you could make a case for number one all over again. the time frame you mentioned would be...
just putting it out there... we always hear the "what if marciano had fought the giants holyfield fought" line. well, what if holyfield had fought...
dream match-up. i think moore is one of the few who could stick with walcott on the tactical front, and i could see both of them landing cleanly...
they absolutely were.
walcott clowns both versions of foreman.
whitaker was a technician then. he just happened to be a special one who liked to improvise from time to time too.
whitaker may have had the skills to fight like a typical textbook technician, but he sure didn't fight like one most of the time... he freestyled!...
