you must be ****ing joking. just watch the first 10 seconds of that hatton/castillo video. 10seconds of holding. he stepped in as soon as...
he allowed plenty of holding & grabbing in the hatton/castillo & b-hop/calzaghe fights. cortez just favours the fighter he's been told to let win.
i think the almost complete lack of interest in adamek/vitali world title fight vs the explosion of interest after david haye gave one interview...
you don't take a point off a fighter for "intent". cite one other example where a ref has done that. ****ing bull****.
hatton actually did better on the hbo scorecard than the sky scorecard...so you're just talking bollocks. :happy
yes. standing still is running. ******.
jordan & armstrong faced the best competition available in their sports, they did it over and over again & proved beyond doubt against all comers...
people are comparing a guy who got koed by audley harrison to george foreman? i sincerely hope a lot of people on this thread are just having...
iirc 90% of the posts leading up to haye/wlad were calling haye a ***** & saying he would get koed by the first jab that landed. it's not like...
anyone who calls what haye did "running" doesn't know what they are talking about. standing in range & slipping shots is not "running". haye was...
it means nothing...the pros are different. that said; khan looks a much better pro than ortiz...i would strongly favour amir if they ever fought.
the offer was "reasonable". it just wasn't "exceptional".
if kessler had the title...& kessler was bringing in the guaranteed money... yeah...i don't see why bute wouldn't take a 60/40 split that would...
you are biased tho. & clearly wrong. :good
i'll be honest; khan spanks ortiz. bends him over his knee & spanks him like a little child. one decent win & ****ers are all over ortiz's nuts....
