Beeyatch...read the thread title, and tell me my post don't apply. And yes, I did enter a Pac thread today and "downplayed" some of the **** he said.
Scroll up. Never said it wasn't a success.
I have more cons to your pros...I win.
Floyd be already getting some 50 every night......
In economics the term is law of diminishing returns. The more there is of a commodity, the less valuable it becomes. The inverse of that is...
Considering it was a stacked card, the numbers could've been higher. Jacking up the price an extra 10 dollars may have something to do with it....
But better? That's a bold statement since Manny is actually lauded for those same attributes.
Haven't posted in here in awhile. Hmm, lemme just say that Floyd relies more on his reflexes to counter than does Marquez. That's why he tends to...
Bradley has a better chin and better stamina than Packy? Shirley, u can't be serious?
Evangelical Pacquiao....am a big Pac fan, but I hope he don't stuff that **** down our throat on the next 24/7.
Tell Floyd to get some Hoya cajones....and btw, u do know of someone who had a similar 3 year run. Respect!
don't bother.....it goes one ear and out the other.
If Manny hattons Bradley....Floyd retires.
Now do you see the logic of only doing recent numbers? As in my past 3 years proposal??
Half of Manny's ppv was at 135 and under. He also fights more than once a year (law of diminishing returns)
