it was the only one because naz never tried to redeem himself and made this fight the one that defined his career. any fighter will always be...
no its fine if you believe that. you just have to back it up if thats what you believe.
apologies. read it wrong about the toney taking the **** out of the jones and hopkins piece.
thats a poor, poor example in the bigger picture and you know it.
fair call but you are a nationalistic poster. thats why you couldnt help that "froch would have beaten them faster" end to the other post.
froch's skills arent underrated and you know that as well as i do. but this fight will ask questions of dirrell as a complete fighter. hes...
you were doing fine until you tried to put froch onn a nationlistic pedestal right at the end
why do you think dirrel loses to froch?
good post..and honest.
his resume is also head and shoulders above anyone else's. dont be naaive enough to write him off
if you never met him and dont know whats he like then dont ask someone else to respect him...or judge their opinions.
i'm sure you did...but naseem was outclassed and never tried to prove us wrong.
can marquez and berto..not going to happen.
what a shame boxing fans can't live by the chants that unite them and put someone on a pedestal.
its ironic that people say hatton shouldn't fight anymore when the reason why people ask these questuons about him is because he took more risks...
