if pavlik loses to bute i'll give up sex for 6 months.
you're only allowed to say that in your first 5 posts on this board.
i agree with that.
i agree. but hatton's philosophy on that it what makes him one of the most real and respected fighters in boxing for my mind.
froch did that for the same reason witter did that about hatton in the last couple of years - and its a the same 'domino' syndrome that ive been...
you think the joe that fought eubank was in his prime? that was a defining fight for him..not a prime one.
damn right. so would i. but my point is that it was calzaghe and warren's conscious philosophy to boxing prevented this happening. how hard...
taking one fight at heavy doesnt make you a public figure. you knew i was throwing a hypothetic question.
i'm talking about prime jones..... if you keep talking like a baby and dont comeback with your own opinion theres no point....you choose. you...
its a good thing "the money was there" for hatton then, isnt it? or did you think that was divine intervention?
ive never said anything different ever. but because your natural reaction is to be defensive you're not reading my posts...just what you want to read.
if you've even fought you'll appreciate the mental side of boxing. its very, very naaive of you to say that both fighters were on the same level...
ottke was a poor mans version of joe. hopkins was a man with much higher standing than joe who held all the cards. i wont be 'convenient' with...
i agree it probably wouldnt have been decisive. after saying that, jones' speed and power at LHW meant he was one the few fighters in history...
i may just agree with the first part, but if you're serious about the second part you could use some boxing lessons.
