All in all, a very weak era. Canelo, Crawford, etc are not all-time greats. Still some good boxers to watch though.
Stop hating. He embarrassed both of them. He was more skilled than Duran, Ray Robinson, and Ali combined. #TMT4LIFE
1. No, Duran and Leonard were simply better. 2. You are a delusional fanboy. Mayweather can do no wrong in your eyes. 3. Why is Mayweather's...
Pac does not rate above Duran or Leonard. It's generous to rate him above Hagler and Hearns. Alvarez is way behind all 4. Mayweather is the...
Because Hagler was a far better boxer than Castillo.
You are ignoring that Duran, Hearns, Hagler and Benitez were better boxers than JMM, Castillo and ODH in general. Perhaps you could argue that...
Yes, it's all because people hate Mayweather. Canelo and an old ODH are easily as good as Hearns and Duran. Benitez? Not a patch on an injured...
Do some idiots hate black sportsman because of their skin colour? 100% I am sure some idiots also hate Mayweather simply because he is black....
Dude, are you really talking tough online simply because someone pointed out why you were talking bollocks? That really doesn't reflect well on you.
1. Canelo has improved a lot since that bout. He still isn't anything overly special, just the best in a very weak era of boxing. 2. ODH didn't...
Scumbag. I hope everyone around him deserts him and his career falters.
One day you will realise that both Pac and Mayweather are overrated in their own way. It isn't a case of just one of them being overrated.
1. Alvarez isn't in Hearns and Hagler's league, especially when he boxed Mayweather. 2. Even though it was proven that Pac was injured. And let's...
Tank is not better than Ramirez.
That's not relevant to the thread topic you tit.
