You are either trolling or very dumb. I never said that Hearns was unbeatable at that weight. Leonard showed that he wasn't. I never said that...
Sigh. Corrales was 2-3 inches taller. Hearns was 4-5 inches taller. Corrales had a 1 inch reach advantage. Hearns would have a 5 inch reach...
Doesn't mean you have to be a deluded fanboy over him though.
Corrales was weight-drained and wasn't in the same league as Hearns in any way, shape, or form. Next.
You were screaming for Mayweather to win. Stop lying.
You are a complete cretin. Hearns isn't even my top 20 of all time. So your implication that I only rate him as great is moronic. And yes Hearns...
Yes, because he would be able to that against Hearns wouldn't he?
Name any fighter that utilized reach and power to defeat Mayweather A post-prime ODH used a very slight reach advantage and a 2 inch height...
No one said he didn't have any power. Just that he didn't have the power to trouble Hearns at 147lbs. Learn to read ffs.
Just highlighting this point so it stands out. Mayweather was low-output and Hearns would dictate the pace if needed because Mayweather wouldn't...
People corrected you because your logic was flawed. Mayweather having more knockouts does not imply his power is comparable to Leonard's....
Perhaps because Hearns threw in combination and with power. Something that Mayweather didn't do. Name someone who outboxed Hearns at 147lbs.
Mayweather being full of himself is only part of the reason he is disliked. It also has little to do with how people rate him as a boxer....
Yes, LaMotta and Monzon were scumbags for doing that. Do you agree that Mayweather is a scumbag or not?
