prime holmes was a head to head monster. only sixties+seventies ali (all rolled into one) could be definitively favoured to beat prime holmes.
louis and ali. then i'd say holmes, foreman, marciano, johnson and dempsey would also be in a top 100. after that it's debateable... some would...
you'd certainly see tunney and walker on top twenty lists. i'm not sure if any of the others would be on the majority of people's lists. greb was...
yeah charles' six wins over three fighters beats marciano's four wins over three fighters, good call.
for the purpose of this question, it doesn't matter if the wins are tainted in any way. let's just get some names and numbers down. i'll start...
how do you guys see this one panning out?
side note... if you've won a belt at a weight, you should be willing to fight anyone who makes that weight limit to defend it. i just don't...
little to gain fighting solely 160 fighters, although i'd like to see him clean out the division (never happens these days). why fight 168...
solis has little chance, but i'd rather see vitali face him than anyone else right now. unrelated but any excuse to mention it... solis'...
my choice. 3-0 against moore the cherry on the cake.
don't know if i think 'doing just enough for the win' is 'lazy' but... hopkins. he always tries to win 7/12 rounds, and that's why he's involved...
this is a very good pick. that comment invoked an awkward kind of sadness - the worst kind. so is this. hearns, bullied as a kid, released...
yeah, louis was great at hitting the nail on the head... both with his words, and in the ring. precision and efficiency ran through his veins -...
good win, but gans wasn't properly prepared. he got exposed for taking langford lightly, but take him lightly he did.
wasn't holmes' fault.
