i feel similarly, his second reign was epic, but dominant only in terms of the official wins column (which is a feat regardless, it should be...
so in other words, he didn't want to fight moore at all.
wow the eighties were even worse than the the 00s...? i think the eighties are considered so weak because they came after the seventies.
and it took him another twenty years to complete that learning process. i jest!
ali certainly didn't just lie on the ropes for eight rounds. but did he deserve to be ahead on the cards?
1. Holmes 2. Ali 3. Louis 4. Lewis 5. Liston if you merge the sixties and seventies ali (taking his best attributes from both periods to...
i think wlad and tyson will be much more highly thought of, long to go into now, but we'll just have to see... i think people will have calmed...
completeness: robinson, charles defence only: pep, whitaker attack only: duran, young ali if you want to get people into boxing, show them film...
this is as a good question, as i'd rank them close together, but people saying it's ali and not even close really need to do some research. 1)...
yeah i know the history... still a shame, though. while we're at it, i would also have liked to have seen: holmes moorer lewis holyfield...
never heard that... great one!
quite sad if you think about it. the first half the nineties could have been so much more too. bowe lewis and tyson foreman would have been great,...
yeah i agree about the nineties, the hype was crazy. it seems that aside from 1970-1975, most of the other eras were much of a muchness? if i...
devil's advocate: sure, the seventies were good, and the nineties were good too (although it didn't quite live up to its potential), but which...
just amazing that foreman managed to win the gold medal fighting in that way. not exactly your typical amateur fighter... big gloves, short...
