he looks at his best in the late sixties. the griffith fights are the most well known.
lewis was favourite just like wlad is favourite for this fight. people gave rahman, tyson and especially tua a good puncher's chance against...
robinson and charles... the two perfect fighters in boxing history.
it was the reason i bumped it, yes. i was searching for a similar 'head to head in primes' thread in the classic forum... came across this while i...
maybe... but he always just seemed pretty chilled out and blunt to me.
interesting take on it. do you not think he was on the verge of retirement anyway? if he'd won he'd have only been one defence away from monzon's...
oh right... well if we're talking mobility+footwork+speed+balance+technique, ali by a mile.
yeah, not sure either. i would just say that a lot of ali's upper body/head movement relied on his reflexes, and from a technical point of view he...
lol first thing i thought after reading the first few responses.
you mean against byrd? he's answered that question. he said the pain from his shoulder was so severe that it had started to cause impaired vision,...
ah right. i was thinking movement = upper body/head movement. yeah in terms of overall mobility, ali was unmatched.
both dominated in a spectacular and unique manner. they could have fought in tougher eras, true. they just beat who was put in front of them....
fair enough.
completely agree with all of this, monzon and hearns are entirely different propositions in pretty much all aspects bar being rangy. agreed, one...
i love hagler, but i think he'd have doubts about imposing himself like he tended to against fighters he respected/had an inferiority complex...
