yeah sorry about that. just thought he'd get some votes, and he has done.
plenty of people have been lineal champ in two of the original weight divisions (i'll give him three if we're including 140 - most historically...
oh right is that the consensus? fair enough! i just thought it was pretty obvious that douglas was experiencing a one-off level of form. tyson...
come from behind wins showcase the true greatness of a fighter. in these fights, so often the 'better' fighter loses to the greater one....
how could i forget foreman moorer. no one's ever won a fight after being so utterly dominated.
avenging losses doesn't really do it for me in and of itself. if tyson had knocked out douglas in a rematch in a single round, would it have...
yeah, holyfield beat bowe and held his own when he was past prime against lewis. bowe and lewis are the greatest super heavyweights of all time...
chavez over taylor is the greatest, closely followed by marciano over walcott 1, and then louis over conn 1 and louis over walcott 2.
yeah zivic may take it but duran's in with a shout.
vitali has a few remarkable ring records, such as 'fewest rounds fought before becoming champion', 'never knocked down', and 'highest ko...
yeah a lot of factors need to be taken into account. i tend to look at top wins and depth of wins. holyfield is better than the other two in both...
things will calm down when vitali's been retired for a bit. people find it hard to rank active fighters accurately for some reason.
holyfield's resume makes me dizzy every time i look at it.
yeah i know it's close, difficult choice. arguments could be made for either. pound for pound obviously holyfield though.
agreed. holyfield>tyson>lewis.
