btw, witherspoon ko'd him before tyson did. bruno was never a top three hw.
spinks had two defenses. holmes was infinitely better than bruno. then the norwegian guy. bruno never would have had the title more than one...
he had two title defenses. not much time to fight Bruno. one was a rematch with Holmes. far superior to Bruno. Spinks got stripped, don't...
Leon lost in his only match as champ. to Ali. Micheal beat Larry Holmes, beat him in a rematch, then beat Norwegian SteFfen Tangsted. so in two...
in what way was there any similarity between either Spinks short title reigns and Wilders?
hasn't been 245 since his 1st birthday party.
Whyte ko'd him too.
not to mention he is a complete featherfist.
so what? Wilder is a ducking nobody himself.
imo Briedis is top 5 hw right now.
if he gets beaten before getting a title shot, he lost the gamble.
top tier is pretty damn low hanging fruit these days.
boxing was already on a steep downcline in popularity by then.
Usyk fights in the UK, his only chance is a KO. even then he might lose.
how about Duk Koo Kim, Magomed Abdusalomov, Adonis Stevenson, and every other fighter who died or was crippled?
