You haven't even pointed out a specific flaw in my arguement yet, mate.
:patsch No I haven't at all! Again, why don't you point out a specific flaw in my arguement?
Read above, I meant to put C in place of B. In context you can clearly see that.
I apologize I meant C in the instances where I stated B. I corrected it now.
............Second to last is fourth in this case.
What is gibberish?! Why don't you point out a specific flaw so I can confirm my contention.
I'm not disregarding it! D hold's a win over my number 5 and my number 2. C holds a win over my number 5 and my number 1! Again, this is very...
Huh what? The open spaces or how I came the conclusion D is number 4?
He is stating D should be rated above C. What that means is that in his ratings C is rated 4 and E is rated 5. Thus, they both share a win over #5...
All we were provided with is head to head wins! This is mathematically easy to figure out.
If you choose to read my post you will see that I answer every question you may have in it.
I'm sorry but mathematically analyzing data must not be your strong point. You are saying that a win over number 4 and 5 is better than a win over...
C's win over A is greater than D's win over C. They both share a victory over E. Thus C is clearly ranked over D. Not that hard to figure out in...
There are a great number of flaws in your arguement after this point. I will state my opinion after this point: I think the vast majority of...
I'm not 100% sure what you are saying, but I assume you are insinuating that setting restroom etiquette is more "ridiculous" than the trinity?
