can you actually read?
haha, not saying it would! just some of the answers seemed a bit over-aggressive. guess i recognised the symtoms seeing as i'm on a dry spell myself..
you need to get laid....chill out!
this
wrong http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/07/super-bowl-vs-champions-league/
yea we are goin in circles, i guess thats why theres so many threads on calzaghe on here.. i just think that khans media exposure and the fact...
not really.... which is probably why hopkins pulled out of fighting him back in the day: high risk, not enough exposure (or money) to represent a...
well, i would disagree. i think the eubank calzaghe fought was a much tougher challenge than the judah khan fought, i woud say most people on here...
well i was meaing in terms of marketing and media exposure rather than the fights. but judah?? bad example.. he's shot..., eubank was a tougher...
i agree he could have done more, but you can't dispute khan has had an easier path....
just traveling to the us doesnt get you big fights....i went there once and you don't see me fighting RJJ.... you have to have good exposure and...
yea, your right. but you could argue calzaghe did this by fighting hopkins... he didnt have nearly as much as exposure as khan has had, and this...
yea it does, if you get uk exposure you bring in money, which makes you able to get bigger fights, which makes you more marketable in the us..
not saying it's the whole reason, but amir khan was very easy to market in the UK after his olympic silver medal, this helped him get ppv shows...
good for you.. i would rather my country spent that money on improving living conditions for its own underprivalaged citizens, rather than...
