in Britain, McAvoy & Gilroy did it multiple times.
Ali Armstrong Charles Duran Fitz
Cerdan was better, but too short, Cerdan's the MW here, BHop is by comparison a L-HW! in each others era they would never meet. Cerdan today...
Historian can be divided into two different kinds; the Historian General and the Historian Specific. the two can be very different and not always...
SO. if Boxing was like it was in the past and fighters fought their top opponents multiple times and even in a heavier division, then yeah this...
Dirrell is probably the most fighter in the history of the sport who deserves nothing from it. He should get no chances from anyone. an...
you are wrong in this generalisation! first off, I believe Most people that favour past boxing eras are smart enough not to rate an era solely...
Some people will WRONGLY say yes, but you can't escape the facts, which are DOZENS of Fights against the TOP men for years on end in the Strongest...
nah him and Sharkey add up to 49, so No.
young Stribling and someone without reviewing his record.
Ah, NO! but he would certainly have been among them.
IF he had that discipline, then from 160 - 175 he would have been the man. he is, in my mind, the only real throwback fighter in recent years...
what about teams of brothers like the Zivic's or AUZ's Sand brothers. Shorty & Big boy Hogue, the Turpin's, Cooper brothers all varying from...
Running somewhere...
dis is it. they were different & better days with tougher & better men Full Stop! our cream cake softer environment & attitudes would have...
