Only a handful can, and the matches will be 50:50. Those are: Tyson, Fury, Wlad, Vitali, Bowe, Liston. Frazier has no chance whatsoever.
Mayweather, Whitaker, Loche - spring to mind.
The same can be said about anyone's top 50. What makes someone else's opinion worth more or less than mine ?!?
Yes, they fought more often, and they probably fought the best more often, but the skill level wasn't as high. Greb's resume is incredible, but...
Out of the 50 from that list, I've colored yellow the ones that I don't see as being greater than Canelo: 01 - Sam Langford 02 - Harry Greb 03 -...
Read my post again, careful this time. I said that they are worthy of taking into consideration for a top 50, not that they are automatically...
And like I said, if you apply context, there aren't 50 out there.
That was from the top of my head, there are probably some I forgot about. I don't include anyone pre 1900, boxers were too rudimentary back then,...
I never said they are ahead. Like I said, the boxers I mentioned are not in order. And yes, I was talking about Julian Jackson.
I completely agree with this, but based on it, you could tear apart resumes from any boxer that ever lived. Sure, you can definitely find boxers...
Since this is a greatness list, I take into account 3 main factors: achievements in their own era - 50%, impact on the sport - 25% and H2H ability...
No, I don't, in the sense that I've never bothered to rank them, it seems to hard to determine the order after the first 10, and even there it's...
Yes. Hearns is the one that will give him the most trouble and could even beat him, but if Hearns gets tired like he did against Leonard,...
Wilde is not better H2H, nor is he greater. Mayweather is a lock for top 10 all time. Mayweather dismantles Wilde.
If it's a prime Sonny, then yes, he beats everybody in the 70s.
