I agree with that. He also beat his challengers convincingly. The only criticisms of him are his short reign and the fact he didn't beat many...
We must have written at the same time!:D
Bruno would do well at first then find a way to lose. It's what he did against the very best.
My take on the fight, too.
Spinks, yes.
Like those who pick Ali to beat Lewis or Klitschko?
He didn't beat the best Liston. Liston was much sharper a few years earlier and simply put Ali fought the shell of Liston. It is like claiming...
It seems so.
Ali just can't lose to anyone, ever, can he? It's just not allowed. I get it, now.
What separates him from all others is the fact that I can't bring myself to like him despite acknowledging his talent. There's just something...
I think Liston is very good from a technical standpoint, too. His power tends to overshadow this, but he has very good fundamentals in my opinion.
Good stuff. Loved the Foreman one as well.
He still caught a few left hooks from an injured Floyd Patterson; imagine Tyson or Frazier landing theirs.
To be honest, you make some good points. I tend to agree with LouisA's take on the size argument(see his earlier post) and can meet you halfway....
