If you had to bet all of your money on it, would you really pick Parker over Joshua?
Well realistically Wilder should be happy to get 25%. That's actually very generous considering what he brings to the table. It's more money than...
It's completely relevant. The amount of money you can "command" is related to the what you bring to the table.
Wilder was still undefeated and had a belt in his last fight when he earned how much? And in that fight he didn't have the potential reward of...
He doesn't generate 40% of the money so he doesn't deserve 40% of it.
Joshua Wilder Fury Discipline, professionalism and activity matter to me.
A fight I'd like to see. Charlo is the better fighter overall so I would pick him to win but Lemieux has a decent puncher's chance as imo his chin...
Why not? If you look at the amount each fighter earns and how much revenue each fighter generates, Hearn wouldn't have to offer much at all for it...
The numbers would hold up to public scrutiny though. It would just look like Parker is afraid and ducking Joshua.
Realistically Joshua deserves at least 30%. Parker's team knows this really but obviously want to get as much as they can. Depends on how generous...
It'll be interesting to hear what Saunders has to say in response. Lemieux has a puncher's chance but I fully expect Saunders to out box him.
I don't really understand this. Any fights that don't happen is because the two parties couldn't agree on terms. Therefore it's only natural to...
Yet... Ffs lmao :duh:meparto:
It's all part of Hearn's plan to hype the fight;)
As far as I'm concerned the fact that Parker holds a title is cancelled out by the fact that Joshua also holds a title (more than one actually)....
