Calling Floyd the greatest of his time is perfectly valid. Everything that can be taken into account should be, and people tend to value these...
http://www.boxing.com/the_100_greatest_fighters_of_all_time_part_six_50_41.html
This thread got a whole lot better. I stared at this one's eyes for a while and ****ing lost track of time.
It's because he had a Java Man skull.
Maybe, but it's not about what you or any of us expect them to achieve. It's about what they actually have achieved.
See that two year gap? Remember when he was the undisputed Welterweight champion of the world, pretty much in his prime at 30 years of age, ruling...
1. Manny Pacquiao 2. Bernard Hopkins 3. Juan Manuel Marquez 4. Abner Mares 5. Miguel Cotto 6. Andre Ward 7. Carl Froch 8. Floyd Mayweather Jr 9....
None of you guys take into account the fact that you couldn't hit Pep in the rear with a handful of salt. :bart
We've seen better masterpieces from Floyd. It's nice and all to see him showcase his skills once again, but he's had better performances before....
Oh, it was definitely a stylistic thing. Ali would always struggle with Norton. The point is, all of this was post-exile Ali. None of Ali's losses...
There's a parallel to be certain (ATG, superstar athlete never really separates himself from excellent stylistic foil), but yeah, Pac and Marquez...
Robinson knocked Basora out in a single round in the rematch. At his very best, Roy would be favored over every single one of Robinson's...
You'd think he would be smart enough to step out of the time machine, rather than trying to lure Willie in there.
:lol: Fantastic. [IMG]
Ali was capable of things no heavyweight should be capable of.
