'You ain't the sharpest tool in the shed now, are ya?' that is pretty much telling me that im dim, it doesnt have to be a direct quote
i do apologise for the problem in my first post, what im saying is that a prime hearns would batter pavlik as hearns achieved so much in his...
firstly im not boxing mad, and im slated for liking it by everybody i know as they all think it should be banned all im saying about abraham is...
i infact did back pavlik to beat lockett now if i were a boxer and given the chance to fight a fella who has ko power but has achieved nothing...
if you read my post properly u will realise that i said hearns to win one of the easier fights of his life 'what a silly question, hearns in one...
cotto v gomez, being on a tv show doesnt give you the right to face somebody in everybodies p4p top 5, lockett is a close second and shouls stick...
pavlik is over-rated rubbish until he fights somebody credible and beats them convincingly, its as though all usa boxing fans have been hipnotised...
wlad has always said he'd love to fight valuev, so maybe instead of peter we let wlad take care of business whilst haye fights peter
what a silly question, hearns in one of the easier fights of his life
whoever wins the vacant wba should face peter, would be quite interesting, especially peter v valuev! then the winner faces wlad for undisputed...
aslong as the winner faces abraham or pavlik!
erdei v tarver should happen soon...
if he wins his next few fights, especially pacman then yes as he has done so much for the sport, dlh lost nearly all of his superfights but...
ill make my mind up when he fights haye
first of all we need all the other sanctioning bodies to go apart from the main 4, abolish the wbu, wbf, iba, ibc, ibu, ibo and all the other...
