Translation: You can become 'king of catchweights' as long as you bring enough money on the table :-(
Some posters really this funny :lol:
Why so? :think
It means if you give Mosley his credit for losing and getting dominated by both Forrest and Wright, then Cotto also gets his own share of credit...
Actually it was, otherwise Cotto would have looked like Ricky Hatton by that then. Those jabs and boxing skills he had made it competitive there....
I though catchweights are supposed to be bullshi*t :yikes
A little bit biased the most fair post I've read so far :hat
This guy really never stops about talking about the midget. Is he really that butthurt for the longest time? Go fight where you belong buddy
Not Forrest and Winky again, he lost there - twice What makes those as accomplishments for him? This one's acceptable and I would also like to...
Sorry, but belts really don't mean that much most especially today. Just think about H. Sotto for that matter. I hope you really understand what...
Gimme a good reason why he should avoid Winky? cause he can't beat him? lol Couldda, shouldda theories doesn't apply as accomplishments. He...
Nope that's too much
Mosley taking on Forrest and Wright is like Cotto taking on Margarito and Pacquiao So which is which? accomplishment or not? :cool:
My mistake of vote - voted no I was thinking about ATG when I first read it, sorry. Mosley is a HOF comfortably ATG? debatable, most likely no.
This chorus has been constantly used to Margarito as well. So why not pit these two against each other? Why not acceptable for you? Is it...
