You seem so defensive now, aren't we? I haven't even put a thought you said that, but you're already trying to defend yourself now. You said...
This is why you call him overrated????
That's probably because Cotto was undefeated @ 140 as was Hatton too So it couldn't be left out of thinking what if he remained @ 140 He and Pac...
I want to clarify this undersized thing. What's this? Floyd's too small for the weight? Cause I'm hearing alot of chanting excuses that Cotto's...
Don't you think Trout himself just made Cotto less sharper?
Ok, fair enough. That was a nice effort of your analysis. I was also hoping for Cotto to win this fight but I really had the feeling he was gonna...
You're implying Cotto just beat himself last night. So you're implying the Cotto in the Mayweather fight's gonna beat Trout then?
No argument, but in any case I'm not in a Floyd hate. I'm talking about Cotto, which is which now? Too small is for 154? or natural as the other...
Maybe Trout just made him look terrible tonight Can't you at least give Trout his full credit if you give credit for the May-Cotto fight?
His own weight? What weight? The one that he lost just recently that some would claim he's too small for it? :yep
Then Trout just made him less dangerous now :lol:
Naw, Margarito may become monster again and destroy him once again It's dangerous too, you know :lol:
Those 3 wins you mentioned weren't even real competitions in 154 Now he just faced a real competition in 154 in Trout which has become lol Hype...
He's can be used as 'was' It only depends if you use past or present inside your statement/sentence. Again, this topic is in wrong forum....
Ok slightly acceptable but it doesn't mean a fighter is not the same when he loses convincingly cause it sure is an 'Excuse' for me.
