dont you think fighters are defined by WHO they fight and WHEN? i don't think jones or hopkins fought "that polish fella" because name fighters...
how so? i've missed your point.
how can his record be better when kessler beat more legitimate ranked challengers than froch and calzaghe combined before kessler and calzaghe fought?
answer my post..stop rubbing this guy up because i'll answer what you want to say.
dont make that as an excuse for not posting your point of view. my name was 'badintentions' on BBC's forum before taylor beat hopkins. taylor...
good post.
what you mean to say is that he fights like he does because nobody can nullify his approach.... thats called being smart - even if it does ****...
no offense but you're very young or naaive if you think a fighter who was lucky enough to have taylor give him a fight is 'avoided'. one thing...
cheers for that. fits also unfortunately for joe.......
cheers. i think both oscar and kostya have their flaws but they are very simliar fighters with very similar strengths. i think oscar would...
neither should it be to post a cynical response to one of the posters without posting a real one of your own.
i dont believe that yet. the man who can dethrone hopkins can't be taken for granted that easily in my opinion.
you should give in because all you're doing is taking the common opinion against your fighters and trying to turn it around. like i told you...
i fought amateurs and was successful but there was something else i wanted to do and i stuck to it. mind you, i never really considered going...
to be honest this is the big con of modern civilisation for me... how can you say someone is too clever to be a boxer when being a fighter and...
