this isnt a different perspective this is the same calzaghe fanboy rhetoric we get everyday on these boards
doesnt take away from the fact that it was a pickem fight it depends on what you score for. I can tell you that on the fingers of one hand i could...
one ringside judge, several of the associated press and calzaghes own dad say it was close:yep you're lying through your teeth if you say calzaghe...
he only went up to ww to chase oscar
both are equally to blame both wanted it but not enough to get down of their perches and put their egoes aside hopkins i agree should have taken...
id be very surprised if hopkins eats many pavlik jabs and right hands..calzaghe enjoyed more success when he shortened his punches even then he...
how has this post made it to 28 pages no way should this even be up for debate this post is laughable
he also stated in his book that a kessler bout didnt interest him that much or that kessler was largely untested (or along those lines)
calzaghe- he's not nearly as skilled as people say he is his boxing skills are an illusionn created by facing inferior opposition
you need good lateral movement as well stop your opponent from setting on his shots...who would you take in this category?
prime for prime roys marginally better but roys fight game was built more on his natural talents and athleticism than was bernards and bernard...
PBF also worked to the body better than hatton and that was supposed tobe hatton's speciality...very underrated performance by PBF
joe calzaghe
nah no way would bernard rehydrate to that he'll come in 175 max
PBF hatton- all the defensive slickness on display by mayweather and he outfought the fighter on the inside and beat him at his own game.
