That you can. It's like money in the bank!
LOL! look at that poster hanging all his hopes on the Duran fight, foolishly predicting Hagler to become "tight" and "tentative" which is like...
I dont understand why posters here cant do a proper analysis between these two fighters. Hagler is NOT a fighter that Monzon is going to trade...
overrated.
Hagler of 87 wasnt worth a damn. couldmt demt whipped cream and slower than molasses not to mention very easy to hit and unmotivated in that case...
here is a perfect example of the diminutive, shy and timid Hagler having one of his nervous breakdowns due to the magnitude of the event before...
that's just something they lke to use because otherwise, they've nothing of real substance to give they saw it used by some other poster who...
good but not great. I try not to complicate these matters and nobody ducked him. he had as much flavor as Micheal Spinks
there's nothing wrong with reading comics. ever hear of comic con? anyways, it's how I learned to expand my curiosity and expand my vocabulary in...
well he WAS at the end of his career. didnt you realize that? these are your comments "Then how do you explain the SRL fight Mr. know it all...
what a stupid comment! Look what you wrote! How do you ruin a fighter who was in his last fight? that's like saying Larry Holmes ruined Muhammud...
so what if he was a clever fighter? your post is so full of errors and myths. "Marvin CHOSE to fight an elderly Briscoe on the bike" I watched...
you would but I wouldnt. how come so many losses? you want to talk about chokers, Briscoe comes to mind as he lost just about every meaningful...
I PROVED my case. you on the other hand, must rely on ploys and myths What happened in the Roldan fight? hagler did not fight well against a one...
no it isnt. i just debunked that wishful theory with my own reasonable (and detailed) summary just believe what you see on the video Like my...
