how do you arrive at this conclusion or is it merely wishful thinking? from what I saw on film, Roldan did a lot better with Hagler than Briscoe...
well, considering what we actually see of him, and without relying on your erroneous testimony of him, you really dont have a choice
Robinson in top form? My pick is Robinson UD. Too much class, too much everything!
you mean like the way he kayoed Rudy Robles in 3 or 4? OVER RATED!
people like you make too big a deal out of Bennie Briscoe. what was so great about him? he wasnt especially fast or skilled. IMO he was the...
I feel the same way too. He utterly dominated when the experts said he couldnt and then had the experts crying in their soup yelling "foul"...
yeah, there's never been another like it before or since and right below you have the Ali - Fraziers and Robinson - Lamottas and the Leonard -...
it was surprising performance by Ray. Hagler way too slow and methodical but Ray looked good as a middleweight if not very strong physically In...
Wilfred shot at 25? I dont think so if anyone was shot here, it was Hamsho at 31 and taking 55 stiches in the face two years earlier I dont like...
what are you talking about? Valdez never even fought ROldan and you're talking like the fight took place while Tommy DID fight him and stopped...
this will be a tough fight as Hagler found Roldan nearly impossible to hit and Roldan found Hagler nearly impossible to miss Still, I think...
Hagler Hearns is a fight between two super elites and fought at a pace you never see between other fighters nor fought at that kind of level...
based on bone crushing power. literally combine that with a steel chin and sheer aggression and Pipino grinds the "skillful" Palomino into a fine...
Cuevas in his prime broke bones and broke that speed bag. Carlos cant cope with that kind of power
Cuevas dominates
