How can we really know how good the top fighters are at 154 if they don't fight each other?
Comes off as pretentious and runs sometimes in fights. He's just not my cup of tea.
The guys there are more proven. Most of the guys at 154 are prospects who don't fight each other.
Nowhere really. He's going to drop the belt immediately after he beats Smith so he doesn't have to fight Andrade.
About even. Only difference is most of the guys at 154 haven't faced each other.
Both Jacobs and GGG are champions. Both are announced as such. They recognized Golovkin as a world champ. That is a fact and there is no...
The world of the WBA where they recognized hims as "WBA world champion".
I can't prove that their is another world.... BUT i just went to the WBA website, they call the regular title: WBA world championship. :hi:.
I'll ask you a simple question. When Golovkin fought Nilson Julio Tapia on 16 Dec 2010 was he or was he not announced as the WBA champion?
Theirs not.. But they're still called champions.... Which is what the record is about.
The record is... Longest reigning middleweight champion. NOT longest reigning world middleweight champion.
Actually the WBA has 2 world titles. It stupid but it's the way it is.
As I've been saying.... Both titles from a major sanctioning body. That's what the record is based on. Doesn't matter which one is considered better.
That's completely subjective. Objectively Golovkin has defended a title from a major sanctioning body 16 times, the record is 20. Your opinion...
Yes, Kellerman had said in an interview he might think it's a good idea to take a point off for every clinch. I agree.
