1) This thread has a poll where 93% of the votes are for JC 2) Forget in my eyes, face facts: Hopkins is the underdog. 3) In my eyes,...
Hahaha is this a joke? Listen, I will say it slowly for you. Hopkins...Is...The...Better...Fighter... Hopkins...Is...Also...An...Old...Man......
But JC is SUPPOSED to win. I mean in the boxing forums and from everything I've heard, everyone except Hopkins/USA nuthuggers think JC will win....
Um...Tarver may not be great, but he has accomplished certain things in boxing that Kessler did not: Mainly, he defeated MUCH better competition...
It's not about putting yourself out there. None of us have a vested interest in the fight. It's my honest opinion. I still think Hopkins has...
Kessler has no defense. Lacy had no defense. Manfredo is just not a skilled fighter at all. Calzaghe is a very good fighter, but face facts....
Why is Kessler better than Tito or Tarver? Kessler never beat anyone. Tito was the favorite against Hopkins. Tarver was the #1 Light...
To me it's simple: BHop is the better fighter, has the better resume, has looked better against top competition, and has done more impressive...
Golota couldn't knock down a bum who was DEAD tired at all times, had very little power, and was considerably smaller. Golota has always been an...
Yep, absolutely. BHOP is just BETTER than JC. Therefore, if JC beats BHOP, it's because he is 43, not because JC is BETTER. I think that's logical.
Hopkins will beat JC, even as an old man. If Hopkins lost to JC, it would ONLY be because he is an old man. Any unbiased individual would say...
I take Tyson on his best day in his prime, to defeat any fighter that ever lived...in the ring or on the street. RJJ was one of the most...
Tickets went from $100-$15,000. I was ringside, and all of the $1,000+ seats were sold out...So, they still made plenty of money.
The correct answer is...Roy Jones
As long as JC signs the contracts...
