not going to disagree here that is true, but if lomachenko was all that he wouldn't have lost to salido that's the difference between him and...
as much as i disagree with this whole loma thing right now, not in a million years is roman gonzalez anywhere near lomachenko's level, in anyway,...
none of them are rigo tho, and tbh rigo should focus on 118 and 122, no way should he ever fight at 126, i find it disgusting with these casuals,...
True, the casual above me thinks loma doesn't need to avenge the salido loss, I just don't understand how u can have him p4p when he lost to...
BAHAHAHA casual alert i stopped reading after i read why would he need to avenge his loss to salido? sweet jesus u casuals are a disgrace to boxing
it's arum's promo campaign gone out of control the casuals have lost their minds, do they really think pacquiao can make 135? shi is crazy
I know more about boxing than u ever will! and please, loma himself says he has alot of work to do defensively got hit in the roman gonzalez...
not in a million years, I'd far rather have loma over roman gonzalez ten times the boxer roman gonzalez is
people are now ranking it on skills, and rigondeaux is a better pure boxer than floyd
rigo is 100% more skilled than lomachenko whether you want to believe it or not, at his best his technique is better he's slicker better...
absolutely not, if your the best skilled boxer you don't get beat by salido, I could list 5 right now better
based on what skill? then i can't understand how you can have rigo under 3, for me rigo is p4p1, all of a sudden everyone is changing their...
All True, for me also kovalev is massively underrated as a boxer, people are now trying to twist it, but he outboxed ward from range
so now people have changed the criteria for p4p? i thought most people based it on resume and skill? now just skill? strange that just when loma...
it also wasn't the most action packed fight walters vs lomac so fans using that as an excuse are talking nonsense to
