Yes he was stronger. Marciano was a small man, people seem to forget that. Tyson was the harder puncher. KO ratios are completely irrelevant...
Tyson is faster, stronger, a million times more skilled, both in terms of offense and in terms of defense, and also has a better chin. Stamina...
Prime vs prime, Tyson will outpoint him. But this version of Ali, Tyson would knock him out cold. He wears him down with the body shots and then...
No he doesn't. Tyson whoops him.
So Marciano beats him, yet Tyson, who is vastly superior to Marciano, doesn't. Brilliant logic there pal. :risas3::risas3::risas3:
And yet people never give Tyson the same benefit of the doubt, despite being in a similar situation. Quite worse I'd say, since Tyson only had 8...
Tyson beats any version of Ali. Dempsey will trouble him, but Ali still wins. Ali outpoints Marciano and Patterson.
Fury yes, he clearly beats Louis, it will be a demolition job. I've never rated Joshua very highly though. And by modern I meant post 1980.
I can't say exactly what size, but it doesn't look that small to me, it seems like it's 19 foot.
The ring wasn't small at all.
Modern boxers obliterate him.
NO
Turpin simply beat SRR cause SRR underestimated him and cause he was tired from his exhibition tour in Europe. My money's on Tiger out-boxing Turpin
1990-1992 George. By that time, he had shaken his ring rust off and was also in good physical shape.
Do you have a link to them saying that ? Or a clip of a newspaper or something like that ?
