Np problem mate. :D That is true. But most of them were not that good. And the eye test still shows him to be slow. You could see some of his...
Horse****. Holyfield was never considered the best title challenger in the 80s.
Great post. Yes, a fully focused prime Mike can pretty much beat anyone that ever lived.
He wasn't even prime for Douglas, let alone for Holyfield. One's prime has got nothing to do with age. As soon as Tyson achieved all his goals, he...
That's cause he didn't get to face them while he was at his best/in his prime. Did Holyfield face all those men ?!? Did Lewis ?!? Tyson beat all...
No it ain't. Tyson dominated from 85 to 90, that's 5 years, 4 of which saw him with a belt on his body. It's the number of title defenses that...
Louis is inferior to modern HW's like Tyson.
No, it was not, he wasn't prepared for that fight.
Great comment.
Leonard was not a big puncher
Like pushing and shoving Mike around, which was what me and Puggui were talking about, whether Foreman can do it or not.
That's the thing, he can prevent it. He's gonna punch Foreman when Foreman uses his hands for something other than punching or blocking. Foreman...
1900's: 1. Joe Gans 2. James J. Jeffries 3. Stanley Ketchel 4. Sam Langford 5. Bob Fitzsimmons 6. Jack Johnson 7. Tommy Ryan 8. Terry McGovern 9....
Holyfield was roided to the gills and Mike was no longer prime. And Smith was bigger than Foreman and most likely just as strong if not stronger...
Yes.
