Who is the tougher opponent - 2009 Chris Arreola or 2003 Vitali? Most posters on this forum are exploding in a shower of jizz over Vitali beating...
Roy Jones (2004): "If he acts crazy, he'll go early," "If he acts like he has some sense, I might let him go a few rounds." ...Roy Jones Jr vs...
Angelo Dundee (2004): "This kid is the whole ball of wax, throws every punch in the book" "He's the heavyweight division's best-kept...
Careful! The nuthuggers will have a fit if you don't declare him the greatest EVER because he beat up fellow legend and All-Time Great Chris Arreola.
Look, the only reason past champs get mentioned is because the Vitali fanboys keep claiming he is an "ALL-TIME" great. If they don't want to hear...
And some are too quick to jump on bandwagons and ignore history. Either that or they really can't understand what they are watching well enough...
So, you state that "Vitali was up 4-2 on all three cards" without mentioning that all except one was close (in other words, he was only leading by...
Wow. What a fantastic rebuttal of my points. :roll: Although, what do I expect from someone with a name like "big Ukranian". Too busy wiping...
I've been watching the sport for 30+ years, and have on & off been a trainer for 15+. I know boxing. VITALI HAD AWFUL CO-ORDINATION AND AVERAGE...
He won only ONE round clearly - the second. Other than that, all rounds were close and Lennox was on top at the time of the stoppage, sweeping...
It's interesting that Vitali's greatest achievement is still probably a loss to a fighter roughly this age. Arreola lasted longer against Vitali...
The Golota that lost twice to Bowe would bave beat the Vitali we saw tonight. Both Vitali and Arreola were a disgrace to the art of boxing. No...
About the equivalent of washed-up Tyson vs Danny Williams.
Thanks for saving me 5 minutes. :good
If he can stay in the 230's, he has a puncher's chance against anyone.