Just because Hearns did something doesn't mean anyone else could. Barkley could punch hard, and he didn't knock out Duran. Had Duran never...
maybe.. He would beat him.
I don't think so. But Matthyse looks like a hard puncher and Danny is going to have to land his left hook at the same time.
Jackson's knockouts were even more conclusive than my favorite Thomas Hearns. Tommy usually punched guys 25 times before he knocked them out with...
it was a good win for him, but prove nothing as far as his career goes. Keeps his name out there.
Jackson's opponents went down and out with one punch.
Mattysse did well, but nothing he has done yet shows he could beat Pacman. Great win tho.
at this point to say Peterson is on the level of those 3 is premature.
Mattysse came out looking great tonight.
I agree. It is a huge name and legend which Shane has. But like you said, I don't see Shane beating Broner. I can see Broner stopping Shane....
Floyd would not agree to fighting Mattyyse (someone help me with the spelling) Mattysse?
I feel Broner is the real deal. I think Broner beats both.
Maybe.. Although I am not sure Judah is that great now either. He fought Garcia. When he fought Khan he was not exactly dominant.
I don't have faith in Malignaggi, although upsets happen. Shane would have done well against Malinaggi tonight. But that is the best fighter...
who is at 154? Trout would win a decision against Mosley. Sergio is too big, but since Sergio is wearing out who knows. Really Shane has to...
